Home

Advertisement

Customize
About this Journal
Current Month
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
If you are the type of person that thinks Windows is the computer, you probably don't want to read this weblog. Not because you are too dumb, but because you lack knowledge ;).
Links:
SurrealChat Fedora Linux
Sep. 12th, 2006 @ 04:36 pm Nope, i didn't die.
About this Entry
mephisto
My Mood: busy
I know it's been a while since i posted here, but sometimes you just have other things to do in life than write stuff on a weblog that 1 person per year reads. Since i just got a new domain and had to update lots of settings to the new one, i came across this old blog that hasn't been updated for 15 months, so i thought i'd post some updates on stuff going on.
The new domain is mephistonet.nl, and mail works again, thanks to some handy relaying provided by a fellow net-admin on surrealchat.net (thanks tab :P). The old domain (mephisto.ma.cx) will probably stop working on the next occasion that my IP address changes, which isn't that frequent, but you never know :P

Looking at my old blog entries, i got some comments on them, since a lot has changed within a year:

  • The Fedora RPM repository is officially dead. More and more packages are being added to fedora extras, and the need for my own repo kinda disappeared after i installed Smart, and could use yum repositories as well as apt without the hassle of yum. And besides, apt4rpm is no longer officially maintained.

  • For everyone not keeping up with the release schedule: FC6 Test 3 is due in 2 days, FC6 final coming out nex month

  • Speaking of BIOS upgrades, one month ago i learned a 10 year old computer to boot from cdrom by installing a 9 year old BIOS update ;). Retro-power :D

  • And one of the oldest entries was about XGL, the OpenGL powered Linux desktop. Back then when i posted it, it sounded really cool, but they messed up big time in XGL. It's not an upgrade to existing systems, it's just running an X server within an X server, which leads to several unfixable problems. But not all is lost, since another project called AIGLX seems to be doing the OpenGL desktop The Right Way, by just extending xorg and existing window managers (like metacity). As soon as Nvidia releases the 9x.xx series Linux video driver, I can have a shot at playing around with that, since it needs an OpenGL extension that is not yet present in the current 8x.xx driver. Most people think 9x.xx is coming out this month, so it can't be far from now :)



And some new stuff too. I bought an asus laptop in January, and it works perfectly under Linux, except that there is no driver for the memory stick card reader (sd and mmc works), and i had a few problems with older kernels (hang on boot when no usb devices present, audio lagging with sdl, no driver for the bcm43xx wlan chip), but they've all been fixed by now. I'm now running Ubuntu Edgy on it.
Jun. 5th, 2005 @ 11:57 pm Beware of customer-unfriendly ISP's
About this Entry
mephisto
My Mood: aggravated
I switched ISP from Chello (cable) to Quicknet (ADSL) a few days ago, and i really, really regret that. I think Quicknet is just about the *worst* ISP I've ever had. It's been offline for about 5 hours already (once 20 minutes, once 2 hours and once for more than 2 hours). The reason for switching was to get a more stable connection, and it only got worse. Also, their policy states that running servers is allowed (one of the reasons for my bad choice), yet port 25 is blocked. My attempts of having it opened so far were unsuccessful. I haven't received any e-mail for about 3 days now. I'm planning to keep whining until they either open that port or give me my money back.
For anyone that knows these ISP's, don't ever sign up with Quicknet, it's the most user-unfriendly ISP I've ever had the misfortune of signing up with.
Mar. 20th, 2005 @ 07:14 pm Mephisto Networks RPM repository now open.
About this Entry
mephisto
My Mood: happy
Now Playing: Cabin Crew - Star To Fall
I am glad to announce the official opening of my own Apt repository for Fedora Core 4. I am probably the first to open a repository for this distro, since its not officially out yet, and Test 1 has just been released a few days ago. Repositories like FreshRPMs and Dag don't make packages for Rawhide.
This actually came from the fact that FC4 has a new version of rpm (4.4), and my Apt en Synaptic packages didn't work with that version. I already had my own private repository for a while, which included all packages that weren't in any of my other repositories, but now i actually started building packages myself, because i needed a new Apt. I thought others might as well wanna use them, so opening a repository would be a logical thing to do. Let me know if you have any problems with them.
A few notes though: i only have packages for x86. If you want packages for other platforms, like AMD64 or PowerPC, donate me hardware, since i won't be buying any new equipment any time soon. I might buy a Powerbook someday, but that probably won't happen before FC8 or so. Also, if you like these packages, i would appreciate it if someone could mirror them, since i only got a small 1Mbit upload, and i might have to take them offline if my connection gets overloaded. Also, make sure you read the notes on the main page, since you'll probably run into problems if you don't.

Some highlights in the repository are the new rpm4.4-based Apt & Synaptic, a VLC based on wxGTK2, a DVDStyler without dependency problems (at least, on my system ;)), Skype, and a load of games of which most are not in any other repositories i have ever seen. The things you'll see most in the repository are multimedia apps and games, since those are the areas that I'm most interested in.

[edit:] warning: just uploaded a cvs version of Audacity 1.3, but don't install this if you require a stable audio editor. Audacity is known to be very unstable on wxGTK2, and the new version being cvs only makes things worse. i found a few pretty big bugs already. you have been warned. the only reason i wanted this was because it was the last wxGTK+ application left on my system, to enable users to get rid of wxGTK+. if you find any other applications requiring wxGTK+, let me know, and i'll see if i can compile a gtk2 version.
Mar. 14th, 2005 @ 09:05 pm Fedora Core 4 Test 1 due tomorrow
About this Entry
mephisto
My Mood: optimistic
After a long while of development, Fedora Core 4 test 1 will be released tomorrow. Included in this release are Gnome 2.10, GCC 4.0, Xorg 6.8.2 and a beta of OpenOffice.org 2.0.
It's the first distro ever to include the new OpenOffice, which will not see its final release until May. My first impression was good, although it definitely doesn't feel finished. Some menu items don't even work and i had the occasional crash.
Gnome 2.10 is nice as well, although i didn't like the inclusion of Totem, because it used to use the Xine library to play files, and now uses GStreamer instead, which has a lot worse codec support. Most of my video files don't play there. Needless to say, i liked the old Totem better. I do like the new menus and small additions to the existing applications, and the new mixer application is sooo much better than the old one. It sees the difference between outputs and recording sources, and supports all the switches and options that alsa supports.
GCC4 has its problems as well. kernels don't like GCC4 yet, and neither does the nvidia video driver. Any kernel before 2.6.11 just doesn't compile, and 2.6.11 itself needs some patches to work. I haven't found a solution to the nvidia problem yet, but i suspect it'll be solved pretty soon, cause GCC4 will find its way into much more distros in the future.
Overall I'm pretty happy with FC4, but it kinda sucks having to switch back to GCC 3.4 every time i want to recompile my Nvidia driver. I would classify that as 'beta glitches' though, and it'll be fine when the final version gets released, which is scheduled for the 6th of June now.
Mar. 12th, 2005 @ 03:12 pm Spyware from AOL?
About this Entry
mephisto
My Mood: lazy
AOL recently changed its Terms Of Use to allow them to log all your conversations, and, even better yet, do anything they want with them, as reported here. The controversial passage from the ToU is this:

Although you or the owner of the Content retain ownership of all right, title and interest in Content that you post to any AIM Product, AOL owns all right, title and interest in any compilation, collective work or other derivative work created by AOL using or incorporating this Content. In addition, by posting Content on an AIM Product, you grant AOL, its parent, affiliates, subsidiaries, assigns, agents and licensees the irrevocable, perpetual, worldwide right to reproduce, display, perform, distribute, adapt and promote this Content in any medium. You waive any right to privacy. You waive any right to inspect or approve uses of the Content or to be compensated for any such uses.

I don't think this deserves any more explanation. All I can advice is to stop using AIM, and switch to networks like Jabber, which is open source, and a lot more secure. Anyone can run their own Jabber server, so you won't ever need to worry about changing ToU's. Another good alternative is to use IRC, which I think was the first chat system on the internet ever, and is still popular today. I invite anyone to SurrealChat, where i run one of the servers. We don't log anything, don't spy on anybody or try to charge you for anything.
Mar. 8th, 2005 @ 06:07 pm Cedega 4.3 released
About this Entry
mephisto
My Mood: tired
Everyone playing games on Linux has probably heard of Cedega. Transgaming has just released a new version: 4.3. Unfortunately you need a subscription to download it, but it will surely show up on BitTorrent soon enough.
Mar. 4th, 2005 @ 12:14 pm BIOS upgrade.
About this Entry
mephisto
My Mood: cold
Everyone running Linux certainly must appreciate its freedom (both as in speech and beer, like some would say), but have you ever though about the fact that Linux needs a piece of proprietary software to boot it in the first place? Yes, your BIOS is just a piece of software, like anything else in a computer, and can be replaced just as easily on most systems. Richard Stallman (from the Free Software Foundation, the founders of the GNU project - for any anyone that doesn't know yet) calls for support on the Free BIOS project, aiming to make a replacement for that last piece of proprietary software on a GNU/Linux user's computer.
Personally, I think they have a long way to go before I would actually install such a BIOS. Mainly because you can trash your motherboard if the new BIOS doesn't work. Although this holds for any software, you can just reinstall all other software if something goes wrong. Got a broken package in your latest software updates? Just put the old package back. It was a trivial system package and now the OS won't boot? try to put it back using a Live CD, or if things go worse, reinstall the operating system. Reinstalling the operating system is about as bad as it can get though. You'd always be able to boot up a CD-rom to install your favorite Linux distro or whatever else you want to install. However, you don't have that option when the system doesn't boot after a buggy BIOS update. Expensive experiments for end users...
However, that does not mean I am against this project. On the contrary, I think the world *needs* projects like this. For anyone that missed the discussion on the Fritz chip: this was supposed to be a piece of hardware to extend the capabilities of DRM/TCPA ("trusted computing"). Now if you don't think Trusted Computing is a bad thing, read this and think again. I certainly wouldn't want a PC with anything in it that enforces TC on me. The palladium project in upcoming Windows Longhorn will be the software side, but it's no use when the hardware doesn't support it. That's why MS is trying hard to force their TC crap into the hardware world.
What if you woke up one day, buy a new PC, pop in your good old Linux installer and your computer tells you it won't install any other operating system than Windows Longhorn? Yes, I would take that piece of scrap back to the junkyard it came from and buy another too, but what if you have no choice, and *every* pc has that same chip? Your only option would be to replace its BIOS, since hardware doesn't work if the software (the BIOS, in this case) doesn't support it.
There are a lot of other issues as well, like being able to modify your BIOS to suit your needs, and every other reason why you would choose Linux instead of proprietary stuff like Windows, but my main concern is with restrictions in the BIOS made by companies like MS and Intel. Yes, Intel. If you read the article i linked to, you will see that AMD cooperates with the FSF, and Intel refuses to do the same. That's probably because of deals with MS regarding this TC platform, and they don't like the idea of users replacing the BIOS with one that effectively removes TC from those new computers. I am already using AMD, but if I wasn't, I certainly would've taken Stallman's advice and get an AMD as my next cpu.
Mar. 2nd, 2005 @ 04:39 pm Linux kernel 2.6.11 just released.
About this Entry
mephisto
My Mood: disappointed
There's a new kernel available for the Linux operating system since 7:59 AM today. Its version number is 2.6.11 and this is what Linus has to say on it:

Ok,
there it is. Only small stuff lately--as promised. Shortlog from -rc5 appended, nothing exciting there, mostly some fixes from various code checkers (like fixed init sections, and some coverity tool finds).

So it's now _officially_ all bug-free.

Linus


But I'll have to disappoint you Linus, it's *definitely* not bug-free. This is the first kernel that doesn't compile on my system:

In file included from drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c:29:
include/linux/i2c.h:58: error: array type has incomplete element type
include/linux/i2c.h:197: error: array type has incomplete element type
drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c: In function ‘i2c_transfer’:
drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c:594: error: type of formal parameter 2 is incomplete
drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c: In function ‘i2c_master_send’:
drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c:620: error: type of formal parameter 2 is incomplete
drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c: In function ‘i2c_master_recv’:
drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c:649: error: type of formal parameter 2 is incomplete
make[2]: *** [drivers/i2c/i2c-core.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [drivers/i2c] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2


I don't know if it's related to the gcc 4.0 that i just got today with my Fedora Rawhide updates, but considering it was about half-way done with compiling and more then 5 source rpm packages compiled fine, I'm afraid this is a pretty buggy release. I'd have to wait for nvidia's new driver anyway, cause it didn't seem to work on rc5....

* Mephisto prepares waiting for 2.6.11.1
Mar. 1st, 2005 @ 11:53 am The music industry still doesn't get it.
About this Entry
mephisto
My Mood: bored
The music industry thinks online music prices are too low and want to raise the prices to get a bigger cut themselves. What are they thinking? They expect people to pay more for less? I didn't understand it in the first place. Why people would want to pay $10 for some compressed audio in the worst sounding format ever, WMA (if you think WMA is great, buy some decent speakers instead of your multimedia boxes that came with your computer and listen to the high tones :S) that prohibits them from playing it wherever they like? Then why would they think people will want to pay *more* for it?

It's really simple: now they can sell crap music. It's called albums. Albums contain a few decent songs with 70% fillers and you pay just as much for the fillers as for the songs you want. When they sell music online, people don't need to buy the fillers, so they lose revenue from it. It's clear that the music industry is trying to sabotage online music sales.
Not that it's any of my concern though. I adjusted my policy on buying music ages ago. I don't spend any more money on music. Not the overpriced CD's and not the crippled overpriced online music either.
Feb. 25th, 2005 @ 12:26 pm Linux on your phone.
About this Entry
mephisto
Now Playing: Inner Circle - Da Bomb
Trolltech, the creator of the Qt widget toolkit, mainly known for its use in KDE, thinks Linux will grow a lot bigger this year in its use in mobile devices (you can read more about it here).
I personally think they will be a lot bigger then Windows Mobile in a while. The advantages over Windows are clear: no licensing costs, open source and free to do with it what you want. If a company has to choose between a free Linux OS and an expensive proprietary OS like Windows, i don't think they will have to think long. The main reasons why Linux isn`t growing that fast in the desktop market is because people don't want to get used to a new system when they have worked with Windows for several years. Also, the lack of native games is often mentioned. Both these drawbacks don't apply to phones. The companies will get a cheaper and better customizable OS, the customers don't get a vendor lock-in, and possibly a cheaper phone. Win-win situation for anybody right?
Feb. 23rd, 2005 @ 10:13 am Microsoft not playing fair, part 25487
About this Entry
mephisto
My Mood: cynical
Eweek reported 2 days ago on a company called Real Software (not to be confused with RealNetworks of course) opposing to a patent from Microsoft about the IsNot operator. This is a perfect example of a lot of things I posted about earlier. Not only is this stupid patent a good reason not to allow this nonsense in Europe, it's also a good example of Microsoft trying to stop innovation by patenting everything under the sun. Although this doesn't apply to languages like C and Java, which also have an IsNot operator ("!="), because they fall under Prior Art, and this patent applies to "Basic" style languages, this *is* one of those dangerous patents that has no other added value for the company holding it but to be able to sue other companies with Basic style languages, like Real Software's RealBasic. MS' possible new strategy: "If you can't buy or beat 'em, sue 'em".

One thing that might be worth mentioning is that RealBasic is cross-platform, and runs not only on Windows, but Linux and Mac as well. This might be another attempt at attacking open source, by trying to lock the development of programming languages to themselves. I think they see their market share dropping in favor of open source systems like Linux and BSD, especially in the server segment, and try to fix up a sinking ship. After all, Microsoft isn't a software company, but a marketing company. Just think about it: what was exactly the last real innovation made by MS? Everything that was new in Windows XP was already in other systems, like KDE, Gnome and Mac.
Feb. 20th, 2005 @ 12:57 pm Microsoft not playing fair, part 25486
About this Entry
mephisto
My Mood: lazy
Now Playing: Narcotic Thrust - When The Dawn Breaks
We all know Microsoft doesn't like Linux, but who would've known they would go as far as blocking Wine users? There seems to be an explicit check in the WGA (windows genuine advantage) program to check if the user is running Wine or not. This software will check if your installation is a genuine Windows installation. If it is not, it will block your access to program updates, including those of MS Office. Only the 'critical' updates will be available, which of course, have no function for Wine users.

I personally could care less. The only thing from MS i have on this system are WMV codecs, and i hardly even use those, cause who would ever want to use their multimedia formats? Good opportunity for everyone running MS Office on Wine to switch to OpenOffice, especially since the upcoming release of OpenOffice 2.0.
Speaking of OpenOffice, i read a lot of negative comments on its new database application. I got only one thing to say on this: Do you really expect the OpenOffice team to write something in about a year where MS had over 10 years for? The rest of the OpenOffice suite wasn't build from the ground up, but started with the good base that StarOffice provided. I don't know how old StarOffice is, but we already received a copy of version 2 .0or 3.0 with a new computer in 1996. So for those looking for a complete Access replacement, wait for OO 3.0 or something.
Feb. 19th, 2005 @ 09:25 pm Blast from the past.
About this Entry
mephisto
If you have an old Unreal CD lying around, give this a shot. I have made a package that lets you play Unreal on your Linux box, without the need to have Unreal Tournament installed, like most other sites do. Feedback is always appreciated, especially if you know how to resolve one of the issues.
Feb. 16th, 2005 @ 07:58 pm Communists from the USA.
About this Entry
mephisto
My Mood: worried
Like the post below, I also found something relevant about another one of my previous posts (yesterday's post about software patents): a column from the infamous Richard Stallman on software patents and Bill Gates' view on this. It's a bit too long to give you a short version, but it's a very good read, especially if you still think software patents are good for the economy and development of computers. Although, if you think Microsoft is the best, don't mind paying €500 when Longhorn comes out and would like to see MS get control over everything, "so you can use their wonderful (:S) software on every device with digital chips", you might not care a lot if they can attack Open Source developers with patents. For everyone else, you can only hope Europe will not follow America's bad example and not vote in favor of a few big megacorporations to extend their power to suppress the rest.
Feb. 16th, 2005 @ 07:46 pm Removing the lock from your own files.
About this Entry
mephisto
What i didn't mention in my post about DRM 2 days ago, because it would've gotten too long for people to read, is that DRM doesn't work. If you can listen to music, you can record it, no matter how well the protection on the files is. And this has proved itself more then once.
The most recent development that shows that this will always be true is described here. If you don't want to read, here is the short version: The DRM protection on Napster's music can easily be removed by playing the file in Winamp with the old wma input plugin and disc-writer output plugin. This will convert the wma file to wav, removing the DRM.
I haven't used Winamp for a while, but the way i remember it, this trick is very old already. MS created a new wma plugin when they found out how easy it is to convert protected wma files. That new plugin will only play audio through the wave-out plugin.
The best thing about this whole story is that you can even get a 14-day free trial account. That's 14 days of downloading and converting music for free. I always thought music was getting too expensive, but they didn't have to make it *this* cheap :)

PS: I dont know for sure, since i dont have a Windows box, nor any wma files to test it, but i think this is the plugin you need to convert your wma's. If it's not, I still have the old plugin on CD, so let me know if it doesn't work ;).
Feb. 15th, 2005 @ 06:21 pm Terrorists from the USA.
About this Entry
mephisto
My Mood: cynical
No, this post's title does not refer to suicidal bomb planters or maniacs that shoot up schools with a machine gun. This refers to another type of terrorists: commercial companies. For those who want the long version of the story, read
this, and everyone else can just suffice with the information that Microsoft is threatening to kill jobs in Denmark if the government opposes to software patents. Although lobbying is nothing new, it's kind of remarkable that it's always the same company that uses cheap tricks to get what it wants.
The reason why we have patent offices in the first place, is to prevent companies from running off with other companies' investments. In the traditional way of developing products, creating something new is expensive. It takes a lot of investment to actually complete the design of the new products. As soon as their product hits the market, other companies will start making clones of your product, and they don't have to earn their investment costs back, because the original company already did that for them. To prevent that, companies can register patents so others can't make the same product and prevent the company from going bankrupt because they won't ever be able to compete with the cheaper versions.
Now bring this idea over to software. It's really easy to build software, and creating something new can be done in weeks, sometimes days. What if Microsoft had been able to get the patent on web browsers? There would be no World Wide Web on Mac or Linux. Can you imagine a computer without a web browser? I'm not the best programmer you have ever read a blog post from, but i can probably come up with something that does the same as Internet Explorer 2.0 in 1 week. Why should something like that be patentable? Better yet, there's even some urban legend about Microsoft trying to patent the double-click. I don't know if this is true, but they would certainly have the means for it when software patents would be introduced in Europe.
If we'd be having software patents, the big companies, with big patent portfolios, would be the ones whose power would increase. Imagine a small software company building something innovative, but it breaks at least 1 patent, which would become a very common situation with the new patent directives. The company holding the infringed patent can choose at its own discretion wether it wants the small company to go bankrupt or not. They could either deny the company a license, or make it so expensive that they could never afford it. So much for your innovative piece of software.
Now where does Microsoft fit in all of this? Yes, they are the "big company holding the patents", and frequently buying up other companies to get rid of competition, but, they aren't from Europe. Now i'm not a lawyer, but doesn't that mean that US rules apply to MS, and they shouldn't have to worry about companies in Europe? I think MS is trying to get a legal base to attack the open source community, that doesn't have any patents (since they make free software and don't have the money to aquire patents). Since most software either comes from the US or Europe, they would have a huge legal benefit if their US patents would be valid here as well.
I think the next World War will be an invisible one (from Joe Sixpack's point of view that is): open source vs monopolies like Microsoft's.

PS: for anyone that can use a good laugh: Microsoft has a patent on commonly used things like "Multiparty conference authentication", a "Transactional file system" and a "Workstation for processing and producing a video signal".
Feb. 14th, 2005 @ 08:26 pm Putting a lock on your own files.
About this Entry
mephisto
My Mood: worried
Now Playing: Yes - Owner Of A Lonely Heart (Max Graham Sidechain Remix)
This forum thread perfectly displays the core of my upcoming rant:
http://forums.designtechnica.com/showthread.php?t=5111
"Now what is the problem here?" you might ask. For the answer i first need to explain what DRM is. If you already know what it is, you can probably skip this post.
DRM is short for Digital Rights Management, and it is a name for the collection of tools and techniques used by the entertainment industry to make sure that their rights are secured. Yes, *their* rights, not yours. Although people have the right to make backups of their purchased CDs, DVDs and whatnot, the entertainment industry tries hard to make sure you can't.
To get back to the forum post i mentioned, it can be summed up as "after re-installing Sonic Stage, it won't play the old .omg files". .omg is the format used by Sony's SonicStage software to store the music that it retrieves from MiniDiscs to the pc. These files use DRM to prevent you from giving the omg files to your brother, your girlfriend, your mom, etc. Sony is not only a hardware manufacturer, they also publish songs. They would like you to buy it instead of copying it from other people. From their point of view, they probably think its the best thing to do.
But let's now get back to the consumer. The DRM software ties the omg files to the pc they were created on. So if you reinstall your PC, the DRM software thinks you're trying to play it on someone else's PC and block your access. I don't have an account on that forum, and i'm too lazy to get one, else i would've told him his files are gone. Next time he'll store his music, it probably won't be a Sony file-format anymore.
I have personal experience with NetMD as well, since i got an MD recorder and a friend of mine used to have a NetMD walkman. I was kinda happy when he bought it. In those days, i still didn't have a clue what DRM was, so i thought that would be a nice opportunity to transfer all my music from MD to the PC. I couldn't have been more wrong. The software is so strict in its DRM policy, it wouldn't even let me transfer my analog MD recordings to the PC. You can only transfer songs to the PC if they were transferred to the MD from a PC. Needless to say, i haven't bought MD discs ever since. Not even mentioning the fact that i've switched to Linux in the mean time, and they have *no* software at all for my platform.
But Sony is just an example. Just about any company making money on entertainment has similar tactics. Those online music stores sound like a great idea to some, but it's worse then the old model. In 'the old days' you would get a CD that plays everywhere with a case and a booklet and whatnot. When you 'buy' something in one of those online music stores, you get nothing more then the 'right' to play the song. You get a file, usually in Microsoft's WMA format (i won't get into details about how horrible those files sound compared to other formats, that's outside the scope of this post), or a proprietary format owned by the owner of the music store (like Real's RealAudio). That file will work, until you reinstall your pc, buy another pc or install another operating system.
At the moment, online music sales are one of the fastest growing online industries. Right now, they can get people to buy it. That will certainly stop when more and more people find out about the restrictions on those files. You can't listen to them in your car, in your friend's house, at work, and probably also not in your portable player. I said 'probably' because for some players there are exceptions. iPods will play AAC music from iTunes, some players support WMA with DRM, but those WMA players certainly won't play your iTunes music and iPods don't play WMA at all.
Even buying CDs isn't risk-free anymore. Most CDs have some form of copy protection built-in, and might not play on some of your devices, including a Windows-based computer. I mention a "Windows-based computer" instead of just a "computer" because those copy protections all rely on software that will only work on Windows. Holding down shift while loading a CD will disable autoplay, so the CD doesnt get a chance to load the DRM software to prevent you from doing what you was entitled to do when you paid for the CD: play it the way you want it. They can't ever prevent the audio from being played, since it has to be somewhat compatible with old CD players.
All in all, spending money on products with DRM is not a good idea. Maybe if you don't see the dangers now, you will one day regret it. Make sure your next portable audio player supports common DRM-free standards, like MP3 or Ogg Vorbis, and that you can transfer songs to it without using proprietary software like SonicStage, iTunes or Windows Media Player.
Feb. 12th, 2005 @ 03:42 pm Being IRCop can be loads of fun
About this Entry
mephisto
My Mood: amused
There's nothing like a good old oper abuse :P

«Misty_280» seriously tho
«Misty_280» >)
«Misty_280» i am pure evil
«Mephisto» :P
«Mephisto» <= didnt notice my name yet? mephisto is a nickname for the devil :)
«Misty_280» be afraid, be very afraid
«Mephisto» the devil phears no one!
«Misty_280» i am worse than thte devil
«Mephisto» you cant possibly be worse then me! i can kill you with 1 finger :P
«Misty_280» i can kill you however i want
«Misty_280» >)
«Mephisto» show me :)
«Misty_280» Zap
«Misty_280» your dead
«Misty_280» :)
* Mephisto still lives
«Mephisto» you cant kill the devil
«Misty_280» you cant kill me
«Misty_280» :p
<-- Misty_280 has quit (Killed (Mephisto (i can :))))
Feb. 12th, 2005 @ 12:07 pm OpenGL accelerated desktop
About this Entry
mephisto
My Mood: impressed
You might already have heard about the new graphics system in Windows Longhorn. DirectX rendering on the desktop sounds revolutionary for some, but they forget that Mac OS X already has something like that. Linux users can be happy now too. Longhorn wont be out until 2006, and knowing MS, it'll probably be delayed until the winter of 2006/2007, but developers have already build a working OpenGL accelerated X server for Linux called Xgl. In the post on his weblog, Nat Friedman says:
"With Gtk moving to Cairo, the X server running on Glitz/OpenGL, and hardware vendors providing 3d-accelerated OpenGL drivers for their cards, we will have a UI/graphics platform as powerful as OS X or Windows."
and seeing how fast Linux developes lately, i'm willing to bet that linux will have a hardware accelerated desktop before Longhorn's release.
One thing he is mistaking about is the current Windows graphics UI as being "powerful". Even with the new skinning system on XP, its still based on the more then 10 years old GDI system, so GTK2 is probably a lot more powerful then the XP graphics system. But let's just assume he is referring to Longhorn for now.
Feb. 12th, 2005 @ 11:05 am Site name
About this Entry
mephisto
My Mood: happy
Oh btw, i almost forgot: The log's title is temporary. If i think of something better i'll change it. If you got suggestions i'm interested as well. This entry is also to test my new software (drivel)